Is giftedness characterized by asynchronous development?

Gifted children form a unique and diverse group with specific developmental needs. The concept of asynchronous development, where cognitive, emotional, and physical development do not progress at the same rate, is essential to understanding how these children grow and how professionals can support them.

What is Asynchronous Development?

Asynchronous development refers to the discrepancy between different aspects of development, such as cognitive abilities and social or emotional skills. In general, the emotional and social development of gifted children aligns with their cognitive development. For example, social development (theory of mind, friendship expectations) progresses at a faster pace in gifted children compared to their intellectually average peers (Kalbfleisch, 2009). Additionally, findings from the meta-analysis by Abdulla-Alabbasi et al. (2020) showed that gifted students performed significantly better than non-gifted students on nearly all skills related to emotional intelligence, although the effect size was small.

However, for some gifted children, development may follow a more asynchronous pattern. It is important to note that asynchronous development itself is not inherently problematic. The challenges mainly arise when the child is in an environment that does not adequately meet their cognitive, social, and emotional needs. A discrepancy where cognitive development significantly outpaces that of peers while emotional or social skills remain more in line with chronological age can lead to inner tensions and difficulties in social situations, especially if there is a lack of appropriate support and understanding (Silverman, 1997).

Examples of this include a six-year-old who understands advanced mathematical concepts but still wants to play in a princess costume, or an eight-year-old who engages in deep discussions about ethics but becomes extremely upset when routines suddenly change. Similarly, a twelve-year-old who comprehends Shakespeare may struggle to resolve a simple disagreement with peers. Likewise, a twelve-year-old who reads books on quantum physics may become deeply saddened when a friend cancels a planned meeting, as they may struggle to understand or process the social interaction.

These examples illustrate how complex it can be for both the child and their environment to navigate these discrepancies. This contrast can lead to frustration, both for the child and those around them (Alsop, 2003). Moreover, parents and teachers may misinterpret this behavior, potentially resulting in misdiagnoses or inadequate support.

The impact of an unsupportive environment on self-image and social relationships

Gifted children often experience tension between their need for intellectual challenge and social connection. These tensions, whether or not related to asynchronous development, can have a profound impact on their self-image and social relationships (Andronaco, Shute & McLachlan, 2014). Since gifted children tend to be intellectually ahead of their peers, they may struggle to find meaningful connections with age-mates. This lack of social peers often reinforces feelings of isolation and misunderstanding. For example, a gifted child who understands advanced scientific concepts and delves into astrophysics may feel alienated in a group of peers primarily engaged in play or simpler topics like comic books or pop music. This sense of "being different" can undermine the child’s self-image, leading to insecurity, social withdrawal, and even fear of being themselves (Silverman, 1997).

Another example is a gifted child with a strong interest in complex topics such as politics or philosophy, who finds conversations with adults more engaging than those with age-mates. While these intellectual interactions foster cognitive growth, the lack of mutual understanding with peers can lead to social isolation. This may cause the child to perceive themselves as "abnormal," further contributing to a negative self-image.

Additionally, their accelerated development can lead gifted children to feel pressured to adapt to their environment. Some children choose to hide their abilities to be more accepted by their peers, for example, by deliberately simplifying their vocabulary or pretending not to understand certain concepts. This masking through conformity can result in underachievement and identity loss, as these children learn to deny their true selves in order to gain social acceptance (Alsop, 2003).

In the long run, constantly hiding their true intellectual and emotional needs can lead to a distorted self-image and even feelings of emptiness or self-alienation. This often happens when children repeatedly notice that their true interests or thought processes are ignored or discouraged, making it difficult for them to define their self-worth outside of the social context.

Social rejection by peers is a common challenge for gifted children. Their unique interests, such as programming languages or classical music, and their often deep-thinking styles can make it difficult for them to connect with peers who do not share these interests. Without adequate support, these children may struggle to develop healthy social skills, such as building reciprocal friendships. This not only increases their social isolation but can also negatively impact their emotional well-being (Silverman, 1997).

An example of this is a child who rarely finds a partner for group assignments in class because classmates perceive them as "too serious" or "too smart," leading to social isolation.

These examples illustrate that the difficulties do not stem directly from asynchronous development but rather from an environment that fails to meet the unique developmental needs of these children. When a gifted child is placed in a stimulating and understanding environment, where they receive intellectual challenges and can engage in social interactions with like-minded peers, many of these tensions can be reduced or even prevented.

To overcome these challenges, it is crucial for healthcare professionals and education specialists to create an environment where gifted children can develop both intellectually and socio-emotionally. By focusing on adapting the environment rather than 'correcting' the child, a foundation can be laid for healthy development in which gifted children feel accepted and understood.

It is important to provide them with access to networks of intellectual peers, such as special programs for gifted students or extracurricular activities that align with their interests. For example, a gifted child who enjoys chess could join a chess club, where they not only refine their skills but also meet like-minded peers who understand and share their interests. These experiences not only help reduce feelings of isolation but also contribute to building a more positive self-image.

Support for gifted children

1. Recognizing individual needs

Healthcare professionals play a crucial role in identifying and supporting the unique needs of gifted children, addressing both their emotional and social needs as well as their cognitive abilities. By focusing on these aspects, they can create an environment where gifted children feel understood, accepted, and safe, which fosters their overall development (Alsop, 2003).

For example, a boy with high intellectual capacity but limited social skills may greatly benefit from a combination of social skills training and challenging academic work, where both aspects complement each other. Providing programs that connect these children with like-minded peers, such as special group activities or clubs, not only enhances their sense of belonging but also enriches their social interactions. Through such initiatives, they feel less isolated and have the opportunity to strengthen both their intellectual and social skills in a stimulating environment.

2. Communication and collaboration

Collaboration between parents, teachers, and other care providers is crucial to effectively supporting the complex needs of gifted children. A holistic approach ensures that all aspects of the child's development are considered in a plan that integrates cognitive, emotional, and social needs (Silverman, 1997).

A good example is a multidisciplinary meeting where a teacher, psychologist, and parent coordinate how to challenge the child in the classroom without causing overstimulation. This may result in a personalized plan in which the child accelerates in certain subjects, such as math or language, while also receiving emotional support through individual guidance or social skills training. By combining the expertise of various stakeholders, a balanced approach is created that addresses both the child's talents and vulnerabilities.

3. Training and awareness

Many professionals in healthcare and education lack sufficient knowledge of the characteristics of giftedness and the impact of possible asynchronous development, which can lead to misdiagnoses and inappropriate interventions. Training in recognizing the signs of giftedness and applying targeted strategies is therefore essential to prevent these issues and provide appropriate support (Wood & Laycraft, 2020).

A common example is a child with intense behavioral issues who is mistakenly diagnosed with ADHD, while the real issue stems from boredom and a lack of intellectual challenge in the classroom. Failure to recognize the specific needs of gifted children can lead to unnecessary stigmatization or inadequate treatment. A solid understanding of the role of asynchrony, where cognitive abilities and emotional development do not always progress at the same pace, can help professionals interpret these behaviors correctly and create a supportive environment that offers both challenge and emotional balance.

4. Adapting the environment

Findings from various studies emphasize that a supportive environment is essential in mitigating the impact of accelerated development, whether asynchronous or not, in gifted children. By reducing the tension between the child’s developmental profile and environmental demands, they can function better and develop more harmoniously. This requires adjustments in the curriculum, social interactions, and expectations to meet the child's unique needs.

Alsop (2003) states that a school environment that combines intellectual challenge with social support significantly contributes to the psychosocial adjustment of gifted children. Without such adaptations, children in regular school settings may experience stress, behavioral issues, and social isolation (Alsop, 2003; Andronaco et al., 2014).

Additionally, Silverman (1997) highlights the importance of a well-matched environment, such as programs that utilize Vygotsky’s concept of the zone of proximal development, as these not only stimulate learning but also support social and emotional growth.

Healthcare professionals and educators play a crucial role in implementing interventions such as enrichment programs, acceleration in specific subjects, and creating networks with intellectual peers. This approach can significantly reduce the negative effects of potential asynchrony and provide gifted children with the opportunity to fully develop their potential in an environment that understands and supports them.

Conclusion

Gifted children with asynchronous development require a nuanced and compassionate approach. By understanding the theories and findings of researchers such as Silverman, Alsop, and others, healthcare professionals can contribute to the well-being and optimal development of these children. Recognizing their unique challenges and strengths forms the foundation for successful support. Understanding giftedness and asynchrony is essential to grasp their profound effects on self-image and social relationships and to effectively guide these children.

References

• Abdulla Alabbasi, A. M., A. Ayoub, A. E., & Ziegler, A. O. (2020). Are gifted students more emotionally intelligent than their non-gifted peers? A meta-analysis. High Ability Studies, 1-29.

• Alsop, G. (2003). Asynchrony: Intuitively valid and theoretically reliable. Roeper Review, 25(3), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554213

• Andronaco, J. A., Shute, R., & McLachlan, A. (2014). Exploring asynchrony as a theoretical framework for understanding giftedness: A case of cognitive dissonance? Roeper Review, 36(4), 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.945218

• Kalbfleisch, M. L. (2009). The neural plasticity of giftedness. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International Handbook on Giftedness (pp. 275-294). Springer.

• Silverman, L. K. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3-4), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.1997.9681865

• Wood, V. R., & Laycraft, K. C. (2020). How can we better understand, identify, and support highly gifted and profoundly gifted students? Annals of Cognitive Science, 4(1), 143-165. https://doi.org/10.36959/447/348

Copyright © 2025 Dr. Sabine Sypré – All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form or by any means, whether electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author. Sharing online is permitted provided the author is credited and a link to this article is included.